Title: Andruzzi Levitation
Description: Anybody try it
zinally - January 1, 2005 11:17 AM (GMT)
Did anybody try andruzzi levitation compare with balducchi levitation. Which is better? :rolleyes:
Desmond - January 1, 2005 11:53 AM (GMT)
wads andruzzi levitation ...got any demo or vid? B)
phoenixsam - January 1, 2005 12:35 PM (GMT)
The magician floats 6 inches off the ground with spectators in front and behind him.
[Ling] - January 1, 2005 02:16 PM (GMT)
Erm, I personally think that Balducci one is better, cos it's more convinent in a sense, as compared to that Andruzzi which needs extra gimmicks. B)
GordonLi - January 1, 2005 03:09 PM (GMT)
i think balducci, in light of its over-exposure, is not too gd. moreover, its quite sensitive.
[Ling] - January 1, 2005 03:13 PM (GMT)
Hiaz, over-exposure of Balducci ruined the whole effect badly... But it works Ok if you catch audiences off guard. ;)
Nicholas - January 1, 2005 03:22 PM (GMT)
Balducci , nothing else for me......
at 1st i thought it was lousy because i saw Blaine did it..... but ...
after seeing solomon doing it , with some tips .......
i have nothing else to say , Balducci , you will have no problems with it
B)
heartsofclubs - January 2, 2005 06:59 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Nicholas @ Jan 1 2005, 11:22 PM) |
Balducci , nothing else for me...... at 1st i thought it was lousy because i saw Blaine did it..... but ... after seeing solomon doing it , with some tips ....... i have nothing else to say , Balducci , you will have no problems with it
B) |
yeeps.. hey elevator! that one is a killer too.. Tho balducci is nice. Elevator will shock those who believe in balducci and kings etc.
lllusion112 - February 27, 2005 09:04 AM (GMT)
try out zero gravity, it about the same as andruzzi bt the gimmick is better.
manraj007 - March 24, 2005 12:36 PM (GMT)
definately the balducci levitation man..works prefect..i always show them to my sch mates and they go blank..haha..nice nice//..one of the very few solid tricks.. B)
lllusion112 - April 8, 2005 02:01 PM (GMT)
hi manraj, this is jason. u dunno wat is andruzzi arent u? i wore the gimmick to sch once. it felt extremely unconfortable as u might be afraid of ppl seeing it, bt i managed to gt through the day, lol. despite the inconvenience, the effect is quite good. prefers elevator more though.
GordonLi - April 25, 2005 09:59 AM (GMT)
i personally do not like using those kind of gimmicks.
its cumbersome, troublesome, uncomfortable and expensive in my opinion. and it just hurts if i have to CUT up stuff.
not really worth it...
R_jayz - April 25, 2005 12:58 PM (GMT)
this levitation is not as good as the balducci... it wastes money and i think the action to perform this would be quite awkward.
GordonLi - April 25, 2005 01:05 PM (GMT)
imo, i think that both are not too ideal.
balducci is very angle-sensitive and over-exposed.
andruzzi although is slightly less angle sensitive, it is more troublesome, expensive, uncomfortable, etc.
im still waiting to get word on the ultimate levitation thing...
darkmagician - April 26, 2005 12:53 PM (GMT)
R_jayz - April 26, 2005 01:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (darkmagician @ Apr 26 2005, 08:53 PM) |
| how about king rising? |
off topic but...anyway..
king rising is ok, but also has angle issues... may be a bit too obvious, too. ultimate levitatiion is still no 1. followed by elevator.